systematics
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
systematics [2019/12/28 05:30] scotty |
systematics [2019/12/29 01:13] (current) 71.174.33.216 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| "Numbers then become typical psychological patterns of motion about which we can make the following statements: One comprises wholeness, two divides, repeats and engenders symmetries, three centers the symmetries and initiates linear succession, four acts as a stabilizer by turning back to the one as well as bringing forth observables by creating boundaries, and so on." (Marie Louise von Franz) | "Numbers then become typical psychological patterns of motion about which we can make the following statements: One comprises wholeness, two divides, repeats and engenders symmetries, three centers the symmetries and initiates linear succession, four acts as a stabilizer by turning back to the one as well as bringing forth observables by creating boundaries, and so on." (Marie Louise von Franz) | ||
| - | One striking thing is that Bennett often spoke of the pentad as enabling us to identify the monad: whereas the monad itself is like a collection, the pentad shows a self-sufficient whole. With the pentad, the monad discovers its ‘name’. The systems in the first column are all starting points. In the number-base of 4, they signify a new cycle or new beginnings. The set of columns then signifies commencement, complimentary and completion. There is a meta-pattern.<sup>3</sup> | + | One striking thing is that Bennett often spoke of the pentad as enabling us to identify the monad: whereas the monad itself is like a collection, the pentad shows a self-sufficient whole. With the pentad, the monad discovers its ‘name’.<sup>3</sup> |
| ==== Lattice Systematics ==== | ==== Lattice Systematics ==== | ||
| - | Using Pascal's Triangle, Anthony Blake's **Lattice Systematics**<sup>5</sup> provide "infinite depth and infinite exemplification. In Lattice Systems the systems are no longer isolated constructs but form one intricate and possibly dynamic whole." | + | Using Pascal's Triangle, Anthony Blake's **Lattice Systematics**<sup>4</sup> provide "infinite depth and infinite exemplification. In Lattice Systems the systems are no longer isolated constructs but form one intricate and possibly dynamic whole." |
| ---- | ---- | ||
| <sup>1</sup>[[https://bookofthrees.com/images/stories/triads/alexander%20triad%20seamon%207%2005%2008.pdf|Threeness, the Triad and Christopher Alexander]] (D. Seamon)\\ | <sup>1</sup>[[https://bookofthrees.com/images/stories/triads/alexander%20triad%20seamon%207%2005%2008.pdf|Threeness, the Triad and Christopher Alexander]] (D. Seamon)\\ | ||
systematics.1577511015.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/12/28 05:30 by scotty
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
