This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
systematics [2019/12/28 04:47] scotty |
systematics [2019/12/29 01:13] 71.174.33.216 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
be maintained while allowing for internal differentiation. An anthropomorphic way of putting | be maintained while allowing for internal differentiation. An anthropomorphic way of putting | ||
this is that it allows consciousness, which gives being access to itself without dissolving its own | this is that it allows consciousness, which gives being access to itself without dissolving its own | ||
- | structure (consciousness is far more puzzling than it at first seems). | + | structure (consciousness is far more puzzling than it at first seems).<sup>2</sup> |
- | **--A. Blake<sup>2</sup>** | + | "Numbers then become typical psychological patterns of motion about which we can make the following statements: One comprises wholeness, two divides, repeats and engenders symmetries, three centers the symmetries and initiates linear succession, four acts as a stabilizer by turning back to the one as well as bringing forth observables by creating boundaries, and so on." (Marie Louise von Franz) |
+ | |||
+ | One striking thing is that Bennett often spoke of the pentad as enabling us to identify the monad: whereas the monad itself is like a collection, the pentad shows a self-sufficient whole. With the pentad, the monad discovers its ‘name’.<sup>3</sup> | ||
==== Lattice Systematics ==== | ==== Lattice Systematics ==== | ||
- | Using Pascal's Triangle, Anthony Blake's **Lattice Systematics**<sup>3</sup> provide "infinite depth and infinite exemplification. In Lattice Systems the systems are no longer isolated constructs but form one intricate and possibly dynamic whole." | + | Using Pascal's Triangle, Anthony Blake's **Lattice Systematics**<sup>4</sup> provide "infinite depth and infinite exemplification. In Lattice Systems the systems are no longer isolated constructs but form one intricate and possibly dynamic whole." |
---- | ---- | ||
<sup>1</sup>[[https://bookofthrees.com/images/stories/triads/alexander%20triad%20seamon%207%2005%2008.pdf|Threeness, the Triad and Christopher Alexander]] (D. Seamon)\\ | <sup>1</sup>[[https://bookofthrees.com/images/stories/triads/alexander%20triad%20seamon%207%2005%2008.pdf|Threeness, the Triad and Christopher Alexander]] (D. Seamon)\\ | ||
<sup>2</sup>[[https://www.jgbennett.org/product/the-dramatic-universe-4-volume-set/|Blake's introduction to Bennett's Dramatic Universe, vol. 4]]\\ | <sup>2</sup>[[https://www.jgbennett.org/product/the-dramatic-universe-4-volume-set/|Blake's introduction to Bennett's Dramatic Universe, vol. 4]]\\ | ||
- | <sup>3</sup>[[http://www.anthonyblake.co.uk/sytematics/OUTLINE%20SKETCH%20OF%20MODUS%20OPERANDUM%20OF%20LATTICE%20SYSTEMATICS.pdf|Lattice Systematics]] (A. Blake) | + | <sup>3</sup>[[http://www.anthonyblake.co.uk/G7P1.html|The Systematics Code, pt 1]]\\ |
+ | <sup>4</sup>[[http://www.anthonyblake.co.uk/sytematics/OUTLINE%20SKETCH%20OF%20MODUS%20OPERANDUM%20OF%20LATTICE%20SYSTEMATICS.pdf|Lattice Systematics]] (A. Blake)\\ |